Public welfare
#1 SpendReview question: Are payment mistakes and slow applications keeping help from people who qualify?
FY2024 reported expenditures
Shareable Infographic
Download or share a summary image of this snapshot.
California’s FY2024 actual expenditure records are shown below. General services, utility operations and liquor-store spending reconcile to the reported expenditure total. Open a service to inspect its individual source items. Each function has an individual spending critique, proposed mechanism and success measure. Ratings follow linked program findings, comparable cost changes and source quality; missing outcomes do not establish either stability or failure. Proposed improvements protect eligible people and essential services. Open Details for the concrete issue, its scope, proposed solution and source-item breakdown. Use the year selector to inspect separately labeled historical records. The Enacted Budget tab separately shows the published FY2024–2025 plan; budgeted amounts are not actual expenditures. Read the status methodology →
0 Critical · 0 Leak · 3 Warning · 22 Outcome unverified · 0 Stable · 2 report $0
Individual spending analysis: Each entry has its own cost critique and proposed mechanism. Status follows linked program findings, comparable cost changes and source quality. Outcome unverified is neutral: accounts alone establish neither stability nor failure. Improvements must protect eligible people and essential services. Details explains the issue, evidence, remedy and success measure.
Review question: Are payment mistakes and slow applications keeping help from people who qualify?
Review question: Is school funding reaching students, or being absorbed by repeated office work and unused space?
Review question: Is hospital money paying for timely care, or for avoidable delays and repeat hospital stays?
Spending rose sharply; the reason needs checking
Review question: Does this broad “other” category make it impossible to see which services receive the money?
Review question: Are prison costs driven by necessary care and safety, or by overtime and repeated returns to prison?
Review question: Are conservation projects lasting, or does the government keep paying to repeat failed work?
Review question: Are people getting affordable prevention and follow-up care before illness becomes more serious?
Review question: Are repeated forms, manual checks and unresolved payment errors making routine government work expensive?
Review question: Are serious safety hazards waiting while inspectors repeat low-risk visits and paperwork?
Review question: Are court delays making people wait while paperwork and legal costs keep growing?
Review question: How much public money is going to interest on past borrowing instead of today’s services?
Review question: After the state sends money to local governments, can residents see which services it pays for?
Homelessness programs cannot demonstrate cost-effectiveness consistently
Review question: Are overtime and equipment bills improving emergency response, or adding costs without better coverage?
Review question: Are duplicate offices, empty buildings or expensive purchasing taking money away from public services?
Review question: Are poor collection routes, missed pickups or incorrect disposal bills making trash services expensive?
Review question: Are rising utility bills paying for reliable service, or for water, energy and equipment losses?
Review question: Are pipe failures and inefficient equipment causing repeat costs, sewage spills or unsafe treatment?
Review question: Are new parks being built while existing facilities remain closed, unsafe or poorly maintained?
Spending rose sharply; the reason needs checking
Review question: Are veterans waiting for care or benefits because referrals and claims keep changing hands?
Review question: Are airport projects creating useful capacity, or expensive facilities that few people use?
Review question: Is a government-run business meeting a public need at a cost residents can see?
Review question: Are collection fees and repairs using up parking revenue while spaces remain unusable?
No spending is reported for this item
No spending is reported for this item
| Function | Reported Dollars | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
Public welfare #1 SpendFY2024 · 43.1% of reported expenditures | $224,532,478,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are payment mistakes and slow applications keeping help from people who qualify? | |
Education FY2024 · 27.8% of reported expenditures | $144,957,013,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Is school funding reaching students, or being absorbed by repeated office work and unused space? | |
Hospitals FY2024 · 4.8% of reported expenditures | $25,154,977,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Is hospital money paying for timely care, or for avoidable delays and repeat hospital stays? | |
Highways FY2024 · 4.0% of reported expenditures | $20,834,650,000 | Warning Spending rose sharply; the reason needs checking | |
Other and unallocable FY2024 · 3.5% of reported expenditures | $18,251,330,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Does this broad “other” category make it impossible to see which services receive the money? | |
Corrections FY2024 · 2.8% of reported expenditures | $14,762,669,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are prison costs driven by necessary care and safety, or by overtime and repeated returns to prison? | |
Natural resources FY2024 · 2.5% of reported expenditures | $12,945,840,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are conservation projects lasting, or does the government keep paying to repeat failed work? | |
Health FY2024 · 2.4% of reported expenditures | $12,285,756,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are people getting affordable prevention and follow-up care before illness becomes more serious? | |
Financial administration FY2024 · 1.5% of reported expenditures | $7,885,676,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are repeated forms, manual checks and unresolved payment errors making routine government work expensive? | |
Protective inspection and regulation FY2024 · 1.3% of reported expenditures | $6,799,001,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are serious safety hazards waiting while inspectors repeat low-risk visits and paperwork? | |
Judicial and legal services FY2024 · 1.3% of reported expenditures | $6,584,751,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are court delays making people wait while paperwork and legal costs keep growing? | |
Interest on general debt FY2024 · 1.0% of reported expenditures | $5,387,747,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: How much public money is going to interest on past borrowing instead of today’s services? | |
General local government support FY2024 · 0.8% of reported expenditures | $3,917,334,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: After the state sends money to local governments, can residents see which services it pays for? | |
Housing and community development FY2024 · 0.7% of reported expenditures | $3,424,097,000 | Warning Homelessness programs cannot demonstrate cost-effectiveness consistently | |
Police protection FY2024 · 0.6% of reported expenditures | $3,274,610,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are overtime and equipment bills improving emergency response, or adding costs without better coverage? | |
Government administration and buildings FY2024 · 0.5% of reported expenditures | $2,561,568,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are duplicate offices, empty buildings or expensive purchasing taking money away from public services? | |
Solid waste management FY2024 · 0.4% of reported expenditures | $1,917,715,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are poor collection routes, missed pickups or incorrect disposal bills making trash services expensive? | |
Utilities FY2024 · 0.3% of reported expenditures | $1,768,764,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are rising utility bills paying for reliable service, or for water, energy and equipment losses? | |
Sewerage FY2024 · 0.3% of reported expenditures | $1,668,209,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are pipe failures and inefficient equipment causing repeat costs, sewage spills or unsafe treatment? | |
Parks and recreation FY2024 · 0.2% of reported expenditures | $1,064,010,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are new parks being built while existing facilities remain closed, unsafe or poorly maintained? | |
Libraries FY2024 · 0.1% of reported expenditures | $710,300,000 | Warning Spending rose sharply; the reason needs checking | |
Veterans' services FY2024 · 0.0% of reported expenditures | $22,832,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are veterans waiting for care or benefits because referrals and claims keep changing hands? | |
Air transportation FY2024 · 0.0% of reported expenditures | $9,178,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are airport projects creating useful capacity, or expensive facilities that few people use? | |
Miscellaneous commercial activities FY2024 · 0.0% of reported expenditures | $8,322,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Is a government-run business meeting a public need at a cost residents can see? | |
Parking facilities FY2024 · 0.0% of reported expenditures | $6,130,000 | Outcome unverified Review question: Are collection fees and repairs using up parking revenue while spaces remain unusable? | |
Liquor stores FY2024 · 0.0% of reported expenditures | $0 | No reported spending No spending is reported for this item | |
Sea and inland port facilities FY2024 · 0.0% of reported expenditures | $0 | No reported spending No spending is reported for this item |
Separate source scope; excluded from the headline above. Open Details for purpose, analysis and reporting limits.
Check the numbers
Every California figure on this page comes from these records. Download the data or open the original source.
Planned spending. A separate source from the actual spending above.
Use only enacted or approved documents. Check each document's status and fiscal period before you compare it with actual spending.
Inspect the budget-resource source notesThe records behind every figure on this page.
What these records can and cannot show.
The Census FY2024 general-expenditure measure is $518,966,193,000. This excludes utilities, liquor stores and insurance-trust expenditures; the separate measures above show those coverage differences.
No. This is the latest fiscal year in the retrieved Census state-finance bulk release: FY2024. An enacted budget authorizes spending and requires a separate official state budget source.
No. These are accounting records, not audit findings, recipient payment records or evidence of misconduct. Check a specific claim against an audit, contract, payment or documented outcome.
You can compare the same Census measure and year, but total dollars do not adjust for population, prices or which level of government provides a service. Transfers and local spending need careful treatment.
This page is built from two separate datasets: the Enacted Budget, by department; and Actual Spending, reported afterwards. The Money Map compares enacted fund categories with department allocations; it does not trace individual dollars.
The largest Enacted Budget in the country, by department, with Actual Spending alongside. Every figure is taken from the published record — ImpactLine adds no estimates and fills no gaps a government has left. See the methodology and sources.
The California State Enacted Budget shown totals $297.9B for FY2024–2025. Source: FY 2024-2025 Enacted State Budget.
The Enacted Budget (FY2024–2025) is the spending authorised before the year begins. Actual Spending (FY2024) is what was reported afterwards, on its own release cycle, so the two can cover different fiscal years and are kept separate here.
The FY2024–2025 Enacted Budget totals $297.9B and is published as 8 lines. The largest are:
Actual Spending in FY2024 totalled $520.735B, as published in U.S. Census Bureau · FY2024. The largest areas were:
The FY2024–25 Budget Act appropriations break down by fund as follows; federal funds are outside this total:
From tracking spending to demanding receipts
Today’s reporting can show spending without a complete trail to the final recipient or proof of delivery. Help close those gaps, strengthen checks before payment, and reduce opportunities for fraud and abuse.
Support the Receipts & Transparency Act →Read the citizen proposal and add your support.