Federal spending · FY2021
Agriculture
Loading Agriculture breakdown
Fetching FY2021 File B line items, totals and analysis from the backend.
Loading budget totals
Loading File B line items
Loading analysis
Building breakdown
Fetching FY2021 File B line items, totals and analysis from the backend.
The Agriculture category supports the nation's agricultural sector, aiming to ensure a stable and abundant food supply, promote rural economic development, and conserve natural resources. Its public purpose is multifaceted, encompassing the economic viability of farms, the health and safety of the food supply chain, environmental stewardship of agricultural lands, and the vitality of rural communities. Success is defined by the productivity and profitability of American agriculture, the resilience of the food system, the conservation of soil, water, and biodiversity, and the economic well-being of rural populations. Key agencies include the Department of Agriculture (USDA), with its numerous mission areas such as the Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and Food and Nutrition Service. Core responsibilities involve providing financial assistance, technical expertise, research, and regulatory oversight to farmers, ranchers, and related industries, thereby underpinning a critical sector of the U.S. economy and way of life.
The problem
The Agriculture category, with FY2021 gross outlays of $35.6 billion, is classified as stable. This classification indicates that current spending is generally meeting its intended objectives without significant indications of waste, mismanagement, or escalating fiscal risk. The stability suggests that programs are operating within expected parameters and that oversight mechanisms are functioning adequately to prevent major deviations. However, even stable budget lines can benefit from continuous improvement and risk mitigation. Residual watch items may include ensuring the efficient and equitable distribution of farm subsidies, monitoring the effectiveness of conservation programs in achieving environmental outcomes, and assessing the return on investment for agricultural research and development initiatives. While no immediate concerns are flagged, ongoing evaluation of program integrity, particularly concerning eligibility requirements for various support programs, and the adaptation of programs to changing agricultural landscapes and climate conditions are prudent measures to maintain fiscal health and program relevance. The lack of trend data limits a more dynamic assessment of fiscal pressures.
The solution
Strategic AI deployment within the Agriculture sector can enhance program efficiency and outcome realization. An AI initiative could focus on optimizing the allocation of conservation program funds by modeling the environmental impact (e.g., carbon sequestration, water quality improvement) of different land management practices across diverse geographic and climatic conditions, thereby directing resources to areas with the highest potential return. Another application involves developing advanced forecasting models for crop yields and commodity prices, incorporating a wider array of data sources (e.g., satellite imagery, weather patterns, global market trends) to provide more accurate risk assessments for farm support programs and inform proactive policy adjustments. AI can also be used to enhance program integrity by analyzing application data for agricultural support programs to identify patterns indicative of potential fraud or non-compliance, moving beyond simple rule-based checks to detect more sophisticated schemes. Furthermore, AI-powered tools can assist in analyzing the efficacy of agricultural research investments by correlating research outputs with subsequent improvements in farm productivity, sustainability, and market competitiveness, guiding future R&D funding decisions.
The biggest part of Agriculture is Farm income stabilization: $24.6B (68.9%).
How to read it: Tap a row to open what's inside. Colours match the chart above, and each row's share is its part of the row it sits under.
| Where it went | Gross outlays | Share | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.6B68.9% | 68.9% | ||
| $11.1B31.1% | 31.1% |